0
|
COMMUNICATION
A
productive workplace and the value of a purposeful network
Verna Allee argues that a social network,
in and of itself, does not have a purpose as a network per
se. What we need to consider are purposeful networks which
on the contrary, have identifiable roles and interactions
with specific outcomes.
|
|
Oct 2011 |
HR
Matters Magazine : In what way are the structures, processes and
systems of organisations today not evolving as rapidly as they
should, in order to support a more flexible way of working and
accommodate how we’ve embraced social network platforms?
Allee
: Everyone talks about collaboration and how important networks
are to organisations, yet our default way of depicting human interactions
is the organisation chart. In large global companies especially,
the organisation chart tells you very little about how people
actually work.
|
|
|
People engage in all kinds of collaborations such as project teams,
task forces, councils, cross boundary process teams, and learning
networks that cut across organisational boundaries. Also important
are external collaborations with customers, suppliers, regulators
and other key stakeholders. So, it makes sense to find a way to
model all different types of collaborations.
Real
collaboration means embracing diverse ways of thinking and
listening carefully to each other. |
Role-based value network models are emerging as a new standard for
better supporting collaboration. This is true, not only for Value
Network Analysis, but also in other approaches such as some role-based
process models, new approaches to agile case management and new
standards such as the OMG Value Delivery Modeling language.
From this perspective, the classic organisational chart is viewed
as just one of many collaborations. In the case of the organisational
chart, it is simply a collaboration around resourcing work and accountability.
It is not the structure of the work itself. These role-based collaborations
allow much more flexibility and agility in meeting the needs of
our continually changing workplace.
HR Matters Magazine : Previously, you’ve talked about
some of these challenges, referring to work design approaches not
being up to mark, existing overlaps between business tools and social
network tools, poor linkage between critical human interaction and
workflow management and how change is noticed too late. A call for
more collaboration, you argue, simply does not solve the problem.
What then, does?
Allee : We use the terms “collaboration”
and “social networks” very loosely these days. We are
far better at cooperating than collaborating. Cooperation means
we will all get our own work done while coordinating with others.
Collaboration suggests that we are going to engage in a more creative
process of combining our ideas to come up with more innovative solutions
than working individually.
Real collaboration means embracing diverse ways of thinking and
listening carefully to each other. The conversational style is very
different from cooperation and must be a learned skill. Our business
style of conversation is either too subservient to those in higher
company positions or it is too confrontational and argumentative.
So that is the first challenge – to really understand what
collaboration means and encourage the kind of behaviours that support
it.
The second challenge is moving beyond the naïve belief that
social networking alone will magically lead to more collaboration
and innovation. Social networks, in and of themselves, do not have
a purpose as a network. People participate in social networks for
their own reasons – a purely social network does not have
a shared purpose other than conversation and camaraderie.
Purposeful networks, as compared to social networks, have identifiable
roles and interactions that lead to a specific economic or social
good outcome. So for any network to create value, people must assume
roles and responsibilities within that network. Think about how
people organise during an emergency, say a flood. People very quickly
step up and assume roles: a traffic controller to direct people
around the flood; or a digger to reinforce the levees; or a food
provider to bring food and water to the workers. Once people in
the network assume roles, they can negotiate how they will interact
and can achieve a great deal.
So, social networking must be focused on the roles people play and
how they interact. Then the network evolves into a true value creating
network – what we call a value network. We find that this
simple structure of roles and interactions, which we define as “deliverables”
can be used to quickly define how people will work together. As
a modeling approach it works for a few people on a work team, projects,
collaborations, functional business units – all the way up
through business webs and even global action networks. As long as
roles are clear and transparent, even complex work can be managed
with greater flexibility while still achieving consistent outcomes.
Successfully working in more collaborative and networked environments
requires a different mindset, skill set and tools. Everyone is developing
networking skills, now we need to learn to model the work itself
as role based networks.
 |
Verna Allee is founder of ValueNet Works, a services
and technology company providing tools and methods for value
network visualisation and analysis. She is recognised worldwide
for her work in value networks, knowledge management, intangibles,
communities of practice, and new business models. A frequent
keynote speaker, Verna is a practitioner, thought leader and
author.
|
|