Talent
management in Poland, she argues, is run in pretty much the same
way as the rest of Nokia. There's a well defined process and a holistic
approach to managing people that links strategy with talent planning
and practices. Their purpose is to ensure that the organisation
has relevant capabilities and key roles able to deliver on short
term and long term business goals.
Their framework provides a workplace that is both challenging and
engaging as well as consistent with Nokia values and culture.
Jadwiga's primary concern about managing talent right now is about
ensuring that employees understand their new reality. It's about
a transformation from a company that has been producing devices
to one that is a provider of mobile internet based consumer solutions.
It's a radical change in their strategy and in their way of doing
business, and necessarily, it requires a change in people’s
mindset. It's a change that impacts all at Nokia; a change in focus,
a change from product to service and solutions.
HRM
: Can you elaborate on three key best practices that you have helped
to either establish or implement in your time at Nokia?
Jadwiga
: There have been many best practices in my long career with Nokia
but here are three significant ones. Firstly, the succession plan
in Poland. Secondly, setting up HR in Russia and lastly, setting
up HR in MEA. I will try to tell you about each briefly.
I’d
like start with a Succession Planning implementation in Nokia Poland.
It's worth mentioning that I joined Nokia in 1997, coming in from
an American based company, Amoco Petroleum. There, we started implementation
of Succession Planning to localise the management team because all
first line managers were expats from the US. It was a very valuable
experience that placed me as a first choice candidate for Nokia
Poland. The situation in Nokia Poland was similar to Amoco’s,
with 29 expats from Western Europe, mainly in key positions. It
became very expensive for the country operations; further, our customers
were localising their management and requested local counterparts.
All of a sudden, it became a priority issue for me to deal with.
Interestingly, I learnt about it on a mid-October afternoon while
getting a coffee during a break from recruiting a hundred engineers.
Our country manager asked me to kick off the succession plan at
the end of October. It was rather challenging - I had been with
Nokia for less than 3 months and I knew nothing about the Nokia
way of managing succession planning. Asking about it at headquarters,
I was sent a few slides with a comment: “...it’s all
we currently have”. As time was running out, I had to think
fast and pull together material for the kick off... put something
together that looked like a succession plan and which resembled
Nokia practice. I had some material from Amoco which I then customised
to Nokia Poland requirements and this then inspired me to work on
the creation of end to end processes, templates and schedules. The
thing was that I had to think through all this myself, I had to
get buy-in from managers who were expats themselves and therefore,
not necessarily very enthusiastic about letting go of their jobs.
But we made it very attractive for them and consequently, they wanted
to come to Poland, instead of Italy or Spain (most of them were
from Finland).
Eventually
I developed a very structured process of reviewing Polish talent
on a quarterly basis and the approach I took was bottom up. In practice,
it meant starting the talent review from entry level, for example,
looking at recent graduates and ending the review at the management
level with an understanding that there was talent in the pipeline,
that some were ready for key positions, that we knew what the gaps
were, etc. We did this as a team effort; the management team shared
information and provided feedback on best performers and high potentials
and those who required improvement. We didn't have Talent Maps available
then, in the format as they are in now, but managers felt that they
had good visibility of people potential, opportunities and threats,
who to retain, what profiles to recruit, whose development to accelerate
and by what actions. This in turn was good input for managers to
take to performance and developmental discussions with employees.
Anyway, the kick off was very successful and our country manager
presented the plan at a regional meeting. His manager was so pleased
that he granted him a salary increase! He showed me the letter,
where Succession Planning was mentioned as one of the contributing
factors for his promotion. A couple of days later, I received a
salary increase from him.
I
would facilitate quarterly talent review meetings with the management
team. As a result of this structured approach, all expats were replaced
with local managers within two years. Some employees were appointed
to global roles outside of Nokia Poland. Labour costs were significantly
reduced and engagement of local workforce was very high. Looking
back now, I still remember how uncertain I felt at the time of the
kick off; I was trying not to show it but wondering whether what
I was proposing made sense or not, wondering if there was something
better somewhere else that I could use. I felt this terrible responsibility,
for the company, on my shoulders. That was the succession plan story.
Another
good one of best practices is the set up of a HR function in the
emerging markets. When I started in the role of Area Head, my assigned
geography consisted of a few countries in Eastern Europe and 2 countries
in MEA, United Arabic Emirates and South Africa. This and a few
hundred of employees. My team consisted of only eleven HR managers
and consultants.
My
other colleagues were assigned areas with several thousand employees
and many more HR managers and consultants. Frankly, I was a bit
disappointed and I shared my feelings with one of the Business HR
Heads who replied: “...what you have is future for Nokia,
you will see soon.” Indeed, I soon did realise it when Russia
became the first strategic geography. In 2005, Nokia started bidding
for contracts with Russian mobile operators to build networks in
Moscow and St. Petersburg. There was an urgent need to hire a strong
HR manager for Russia to help with the recruitment of Account Directors,
Project Managers and Project Engineers. At the same time, there
were plans to expand with sales operations into the interior of
Russia so we were also looking at sales representatives and merchandisers
for all over the country. The Moscow office started to grow in headcount
and I needed to push ahead and get my HR Manager for Russia. Meanwhile,
requests for HR support started to pile up in my mailbox, which
terrified me. Managers didn’t want to wait for replies, the
sense of urgency was very visible and I had to think fast.
Since
I had a very strong HR team in Poland, I decided to send one of
the consultants to Russia for a few months. The person was very
interested, so this made it easy. Then I sold the idea to the Country
Director and Financial Director. I explained to them what benefits
they would get by having a person on-site while I was looking for
an HR Manager. They bought the idea especially because many expats
were then going to Russia; someone from Nokia who knew the Nokia
international transfer process was very useful to have. This business
support meant that I could get associated costs approved by management.
“Jadwiga", he said,
"there are only 15 good managers in Moscow at this point
in time”. “Fair enough", I said, "we need
you to get one of those to Nokia”.
I didn’t know Russian legislation nor the culture; historically,
I was never really interested in this part of the world. Now, here
I was having to recommend HR solutions and even go to Russia in
person, despite the fear of being exiled to Siberia. It was a challenge
I couldn't resist. Russia was viewed as a strategic country on the
Nokia map and I felt very excited to be responsible for giving support
to business there.
With
some local contacts from my Finnish colleagues, I strove ahead to
conquer new territory. One of those contacts happened to be a recruiter
who already worked for Nokia Russia in the past and we began what
turned out to be a very good and long lasting cooperation. It had
its share of difficulties initially, coming close to endangering
our business relationship but since he had good reference, I decided
to employ him to recruit an HR Manager for Russia. He provided me
with a shortlist of HR candidates whom I then selected for a Nokia
assessment. Inviting six strong candidates, only two showed up on
the day of assessment. They didn't make the grade - one was too
strong and the other too weak. In any case, our minimum number to
consider was four. Terribly disappointed with this part of the process,
I dumped my negative feelings about it on the recruiter. Strangely
enough, he took it very well and asked me to let him continue with
the recruitment. “Jadwiga", he said, "there are
only 15 good managers in Moscow at this point in time”. “Fair
enough", I said, "we need you to get one of those to Nokia”.
Long story short, the next selection round was successful and one
of the candidates passed. Russia finally acquired an HR Manager.
I
immediately started her induction in Poland, even against the wishes
of the Russia Country Director who wanted HR to start immediately,
work having piled up so much. However, induction was key to getting
all HR work done the Nokia Way. Induction was thorough, lasting
three weeks. It was an intense learning of Nokia processes, tools
and culture. I really wanted a well formatted person to go back
and handle all aspects of HR work the way it should be handled.
For a year, I was really focused on Russia. Headcount doubled in
the first half of the year and tripled in the second. I had to look
at weekly coaching sessions with the HR manager.
We
looked at one particular issue, that of how to speed up the selection
process. At Nokia we use the Nokia Assessment Centre (NOAC), that
is run either by in house consultants or external partners. Our
partner in Russia was SHL and we agreed with them that they would
adjust their resources to our needs so it was possible to run the
assessment centre every day instead of twice a week. That secured
for us enough shortlisted candidates to hire as we'd planned. That
particular year, I coached the HR Manager either in face to face
meetings or via conference call. Consequently, she set up her team,
implemented all the people processes and tools we wanted and effectively
introduced the Nokia culture to this Russian organisation.
The
following year, my attention switched to the Middle East and Africa,
a completely unknown territory to me. I was looking to help build
Nokia business there. I got a business plan strategy for that area,
which I translated into a HR Plan. It meant HR support for two regional
hubs, one in Dubai for the Middle East and North Africa countries
and one in Johannesburg for South, East and West Africa. The first
country I needed to support a startup was Kenya where a sales office
was being established. I went to Nairobi with a colleague of mine
from the HR business unit. We were checking the conditions for expat
life there, looking at housing, schooling, security as well as the
cost and quality of living. This was imperative to design relevant
country policies.
Two
business owners accompanied us and we had a security company from
the UK to look after our personal security. It was fun; we would
usually travel in a jeep with one of the security guards, the other
guard in the second jeep, looking out for hijackers. It looked very
serious in the beginning but as time wore on and we got more acclimatised,
I began to forget the risks. I was admiring the red colour of African
soil all very new to me, and trees with blue blossoms, coffee plantations
and most of all the beautiful faces of Kenyans, slim and tall. Meeting
early on with consultants from Ernst & Young (our global partners),
they shared with us all their local knowledge about the labour market
conditions, the expatriate community, taxation and local practices.
Learning a lot in those few days about setting up our office, my
main concern was to set up a financial system that would enable
us to pay our employees. We visited a Finnish embassy where we learnt
about the economic and political realities of the country, that
foreign investment was encouraged only if new jobs were created
for local citizens. The number of permits was limited and in our
case,s much too few than what was planned. Discussing it with the
business owners, we concluded that Nokia would not set up an office
in Kenya due to weak infrastructure but instead go to South Africa.
Our office in Johannesburg then became a regional hub for Africa.
HRM
: What do you see as key to Nokia's success in recruiting and retaining
good talent?
Jadwiga
:
Several things at play here. The most important one is business
performance. Nokia is a well-known brand with a strong success record
in terms of both financial performance and market share. We could
easily say that Nokia is an industry market leader and an employer
of choice. People want to join a successful and friendly company.
Another strong factor is teamwork. Nokia is a team-oriented company,
which is reliant on good communications and people skills. In this
environment, values are a common platform that enable collaboration
beyond national boundaries, ethnicity, gender or age. It’s
like being in a big family, sharing success and going through change
and difficulties together. Supporting and respecting one another
is a norm, as well as respect and inclusiveness. Employees like
it. It shows in our employee satisfaction surveys and low attrition.
This in turn, helps in retention but it also spreads outside, which
means that potential hires are interested. Take a look at the recruitment
process for example.
Candidates are treated with the fairness and equity, informed about
the criteria and selection process; it's very transparent. So even
those who fail, who are rejected, keep good memories of their Nokia
experience. Another example is Nokia’s performance management
process. The founding principle is simple - Nokia can only succeed
when everyone who works for us understands our strategy and values
and feels personally motivated to make it work. Part of the culture
is a strong employer brand, having an image of an organisation as
seen through the eyes of employees and potential hires. In practice,
key human resources programmes focused on recruitment and retention
are aligned with the Employer Brand Promise. Our recruitment processes
ensure that there is a good match between employees' needs and the
employment experience. The employment experience provides confidence
to employees, thereby assisting with keeping motivation levels high.
The employment experience includes tangibles such as salary and
benefits, but also extends to intangibles such as an organisation's
culture and values, opportunities for learning and the creation
of a career path, reward and recognition as well as management style.
HRM
: What key aspects do you concentrate on when looking for new hires?
Jadwiga
:
Mainly technical skills, knowledge and cultural fit. We concentrate
very much on the potential of a person with new hires because it
represents a long-term investment for the company and is costly.
So, we make sure every candidate, external or internal, goes through
an assessment centre run by experienced consultants. There are two
aspects: technical skills and knowledge and cultural fit. Each job
is very well defined, for example, its purpose, required competencies
and experience and candidate profile. In practice, hiring managers
assess technical and professional skills in a structured interview,
called a behavioural interview. HR professionals are involved in
assessing the cultural fit with the company. Both aspects are important
. Most of our managers and HR professionals are trained and certified
as Behavioural Interviewers. We look at the candidate's potential,
in particular, their aspiration, willingness to do challenging tasks,
agility to learn, flexibility, attitude to change, leadership skills,
fact-based orientation, wiliness to share and support and creativity.
Last but not least, a willingness to work hard and achieve outstanding
results. The key thing is to hire a professional whose values are
aligned with the company’s values. That guarantees mutual
success.
HRM
: What do you do to ensure that the training requirements can be
met by the training provided? How are these assessed?
Jadwiga
:
I’d like to clarify what we understand by training. At Nokia,
when we say training we mean classroom courses. They constitute
only 10% of the company's development experience. So this term
'training' is a bit old-fashioned for us. We talk about developing
and learning through three nodes of development: 70% on the job
learning experience, 20% coaching and 10% training. This is imbedded
into personal development plans that are part of performance management.
The span of time is six months. Unit strategies are cascaded to
units and departments in the forms of objectives. Objectives are
translated into individual targets and actions. Performance is reviewed
every half year and assessed once a year. Targets are linked to
incentives. The better the Nokia results, the better the incentives.
Everyone contributes. It's a test of whether the company has sufficient
relevant competencies to enable employees to do the job. This in
turn means that the training at Nokia which we call learning solutions
are appropriate. It's worth mentioning that part of the performance
management system there is competency evaluation composed of employee
self evaluation. Once done, it's approved by the manager and automatically
goes into a personal development plan. The last thing is to agree
on adequate learning solutions for a given period. All these solutions
are consolidated and followed through.
HRM
: You've been with Nokia for twelve years now. What has been the
primary catalyst for keeping you engaged at Nokia?
Jadwiga
: Nokia
is a great company due to its long and successful business record
and its culture. The 'NokiaWay' is a very strong, cultivated thing.
Values are imbedded into all we do. It's important because they
constitute a common platform for everyone. Thus, Nokia people are
like one big global family. Networking is very much encouraged and
because there are many projects we can work on with many people
from different places, it adds to its attractiveness as a company.
I find that you're empowered to do the job and if you don’t
know how, there are many people ready to support you and help you.
I always work with others, who help me and I help them. We have
a common goal, to deliver results. There's nothing routine about
my job. I can explore other possibilities especially since frequent
changes always bring in new opportunities. I enjoy the ambiguity
because I can shape it and give it a structure. Change comes up
and any ambiguity unleashes a sense of creativeness. It's a lot
of fun. I also enjoy leading people and teams, the more diversity
the greater the experience, which Nokia offers me.
HRM
: How do you see that the HR profession has changed in the time
you've been in this industry? What challenges do you see that the
industry faces and how should this industry manage this?
Jadwiga
:
When I started my career almost 18 years ago, HR was more often
an administrative function, dealing mainly with recruitment, employment
relations and training. HR information systems were not very popular
and paper records dominated. Hence, the HR function used to consist
of large teams of clerical types to process paperwork. I remember
being responsible for a headcount report in one of the previous
companies. There was no system to generate such a report and I had
to design its format and deliver the management board an update
every month. I struggled with pulling together a total headcount
every month. I had to know personnel movement of more than 3000
employees, within and outside the company. Tedious ! Now, with the
help of SAP, it's possible to generate a detailed headcount report
in a company that has thousands of employees, with 100% accuracy.
So, with technological advances, HR professionals are now free from
personnel transactions to focus more on supporting line managers
as coaches and consultants. We therefore, need new skill sets like
coaching and consulting. HR professionals are also expected to understand
business and how it translates into HR strategies and action plans
so they can partner with business managers. They need to understand
the global economy, demographics and legislation as most businesses
operate globally. Organisations become more and more complex as
they become global and this insight is one of the key competencies
of the HR field. The biggest challenge that I see in this profession
is the availability of such professionals, who have a deep knowledge
in the field and who possess a global mindset. 
Jadwiga Zareba is the HR Director at Nokia Poland. With more than
17 years human resources senior management experience as a business
partner, operational HR and corporate HR person in international
corporations, Jadwiga possesses an extremely high ability to run
HR in complex, multi-country or emerging country outfits. With experience
spanning the establishment of HR operations in Eastern Europe, Middle
East and Africa, Jadwiga has planned, directed, coached, delivered
solutions and services as well implemented change to meet business
objectives.
|