NEWS
Singapore
Boardroom Still Mostly Off-limit for HR
Singapore
boards slow to seek professional HR expertise to solve executive
compensation issues compared to their U.S. counterparts, according
to Aon Hewitt and the University of Southern California.
30
March 2011
Singapore
| The
survey - Pay at the Top: A comparative Study of When HR Make
a Difference - polled 78 HR professionals at 66 companies,
and found that while 83 per cent of U.S. respondents in the survey
said they call on their HR for help to resolve executive compensation
matters, only 50 per cent of the Singapore respondents were found
to do the same.
The survey also found 19 per cent of Singapore boards look to
HR in matters relating to board compensation, compared to 44 per
cent of U.S. respondents. Further, 40 per cent of Singapore boards
seek HR's guidance when making decisions on executive succession
planning, versus 65 per cent of boards in the U.S.
"The
difference between the U.S. and Singapore data could be due to
Singapore's relative youth in the development of its corporate
governance framework relating to human capital issues," says
Na Boon Chong, Managing Director, Executive Compensation and Performance,
SEA at Aon Hewitt who was a joint author of the survey. "As
these increasingly complex issues gain more attention at the board
level, we would expect boards turn more to their HR and/or external
advisors," he added.
Edward
E. Lawler III, Director of the Center of Effective Organization
(CEO) in the Marshall School of Business at USC says: "It
is worth mentioning that our study indicates HR in Singapore can
get into the boardroom by gaining competence in executive compensation
and business understanding." Professor
Lawler says there is a likelihood that Singapore will catch up
in due time with U.S. practice as more companies come under the
pressure of more stringent legislations governing executive compensation.
Other
highlights of the survey are: